North Dakota St.
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
113  Erin Teschuk SO 20:06
786  Abbi Aspengren SR 21:18
968  Taylor Janssen SO 21:31
1,275  Tarin Lachowitzer SO 21:50
1,353  Paige Stratioti JR 21:55
1,382  Ashley Heinze JR 21:57
2,417  Jenny Guibert FR 23:01
2,619  Darian Winslow SO 23:18
2,906  Amy Andrushko SO 23:46
2,973  Megan Feyereisen SR 23:52
3,411  Hitt Ali SR 25:05
National Rank #102 of 341
Midwest Region Rank #13 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 17th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 1.6%
Top 20 in Regional 87.9%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Erin Teschuk Abbi Aspengren Taylor Janssen Tarin Lachowitzer Paige Stratioti Ashley Heinze Jenny Guibert Darian Winslow Amy Andrushko Megan Feyereisen Hitt Ali
Stanford Invitational 09/27 1085 20:07 21:17 22:12 22:25 22:32 23:50 23:52
SDSU Classic 10/04 1285 21:20 21:50 22:09 23:09 23:23 23:53 25:04
Ron Pynn Invitational 10/18 1099 20:25 21:19 21:44 21:22 21:42 22:55 23:17 23:03 25:05
Summit League Championships 11/01 1086 20:13 21:25 21:36 21:52 21:54 23:09 23:11 23:56
Midwest Region Championships 11/14 1036 19:50 21:30 21:54 21:38 21:49 22:47 23:21
NCAA Championship 11/22 20:12





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 17.3 480 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.5 2.2 3.6 6.3 9.2 13.1 15.7 15.0 11.8 7.9 5.0 2.7 2.1 1.2 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Erin Teschuk 22.6% 83.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Erin Teschuk 10.4 0.0 0.6 2.0 3.2 5.6 7.4 9.6 9.8 9.1 7.6 6.2 6.2 5.5 4.2 3.6 3.5 2.6 2.2 2.2 1.7 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9
Abbi Aspengren 87.0 0.0
Taylor Janssen 107.9
Tarin Lachowitzer 137.8
Paige Stratioti 145.0
Ashley Heinze 147.1
Jenny Guibert 217.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 0.0% 0.0 6
7 0.1% 0.1 7
8 0.2% 0.2 8
9 0.4% 0.4 9
10 0.9% 0.9 10
11 1.5% 1.5 11
12 2.2% 2.2 12
13 3.6% 3.6 13
14 6.3% 6.3 14
15 9.2% 9.2 15
16 13.1% 13.1 16
17 15.7% 15.7 17
18 15.0% 15.0 18
19 11.8% 11.8 19
20 7.9% 7.9 20
21 5.0% 5.0 21
22 2.7% 2.7 22
23 2.1% 2.1 23
24 1.2% 1.2 24
25 0.8% 0.8 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 0.2% 0.2 27
28 0.1% 0.1 28
29 0.0% 0.0 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0